Skip to content
AI Dev Toolkit.
Esc
  • AI Token CounterCount tokens for GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen and more.Tool
  • LLM API Cost CalculatorEstimate per-request, daily and monthly API costs.Tool
  • AI Model ComparisonCompare prices, context windows and features across models.Tool
  • AI Model Pricing PagesSpecs, real costs and cheaper alternatives for popular models.Tool
  • Context Window CheckerSee whether your text fits each model’s context window.Tool
  • Subscription vs API CalculatorFind out whether a chat plan or the API is cheaper for you.Tool
  • GPU / VRAM CalculatorCheck how much VRAM a local model needs and which GPUs fit.Tool
  • Prompt Caching CalculatorEstimate savings from prompt caching.Tool

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: pricing, context and features compared

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Here is how they compare on specs, on what real workloads cost, and on which to pick for what, from prices updated daily.

Developers weigh Gemini’s Flash model against Claude Sonnet when Sonnet’s quality is more than a task needs. Both read very long prompts, so the comparison comes down to price, inputs and features.

Input / 1M
$2
Output / 1M
$10
Context
1,000,000
Max output
128,000
Full Claude Sonnet 5.5 pricing and specs
Input / 1M
$0.75
Output / 1M
$3.75
Context
1,048,576
Max output
65,536
Full Gemini 3.8 Flash pricing and specs

Verdict

Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash: which to pick

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the lower list prices: 2.7× cheaper per input token and 2.7× per output token. On our data, Claude Sonnet 5.5 has the edge for long replies, and Gemini 3.8 Flash for the lowest bill, very long prompts, non-text inputs, repeated prompts and batch jobs. For scale, a support chatbot handling 1,000 requests a day costs about $169.57 a month on Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $64.45 on Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Lowest bill for typical workloadsPick Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash costs less on all 4 workloads below, 2.5× to 2.7× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 at list prices.
Very long prompts (whole codebases, long documents)Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash
Both read about 1,000,000 tokens per request. One 800,000-token prompt with a 2,000-token reply costs $1.62 on Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $0.61 on Gemini 3.8 Flash. Neither has a long-prompt surcharge in our data.
Long replies (reports, large code files)Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5 can write up to 128,000 tokens in one reply, against 65,536 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
Images, audio, video or files in the promptPick Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash also accepts audio and video, which Claude Sonnet 5.5 doesn’t.
Repeated long prompts (prompt caching)Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash bills cached input at $0.075 per 1M (10% of its input price), against $0.10 per 1M (5% of its input price) for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
Overnight batch jobsPick Gemini 3.8 Flash
Both offer batch prices; on the document summariser workload Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $37.64 a month against $100.38.
Self-hosting or choosing your own hostEither
Neither has downloadable weights: both are only available through their provider’s API and cloud partners.

Criteria use only list prices, published limits and the features each provider declares. We don’t rank answer quality; test both models on your own prompts before you commit.

Specs

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash side by side

Specs of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash; the better value on each row is marked
SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input / 1M tokens$2$0.75 (better)
Output / 1M tokens$10$3.75 (better)
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.075 (better)
Cache write / 1M$2.50No write charge listed
Batch in / out$1 / $5$0.375 / $1.875 (better)
Long-prompt priceNoneNone
Context window1,000,0001,048,576
Max output128,000 (better)65,536
Acceptstext, images, filestext, images, files, audio, video
Image inputYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Open weightsNoNo
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published
First listed2026-09-282026-09-02

Prices in US dollars per million tokens. Highlighted: the lower price or larger limit where the difference is over 5%. Features are as declared by each provider’s API; “First listed” is when our data source first listed the model. Long-prompt prices apply to the whole request once the prompt passes the threshold.

Costs

What Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash cost for real workloads

WorkloadTokens in / outRequests/dayClaude Sonnet 5.5 / monthGemini 3.8 Flash / monthCheaper
Support chatbotCalculator: Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 3.8 Flash1,500 / 4001,000$169.5750% cached$64.4550% cachedGemini 3.8 Flash (2.6×)
RAG appCalculator: Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 3.8 Flash6,000 / 500500$223.8720% cached$84.6320% cachedGemini 3.8 Flash (2.6×)
Coding agentCalculator: Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 3.8 Flash40,000 / 2,000200$238.4780% cached$96.7380% cachedGemini 3.8 Flash (2.5×)
Document summariserCalculator: Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 3.8 Flash8,000 / 600300$100.38batch$37.64batchGemini 3.8 Flash (2.7×)

Each row uses the same token counts for both models and list prices, with caching and batch discounts only where the provider publishes them. A month is 365 ÷ 12 days. The support chatbot reads 50% of its prompt from the cache. The RAG app reads 20% of its prompt from the cache. The coding agent reads 80% of its prompt from the cache. The document summariser runs as a batch job where a batch price exists. Open either model in the LLM cost calculator to change any number.

Tokenizers

Are their per-token prices comparable?

Not exactly. Each model splits text into tokens its own way, so the same prompt can be a different number of tokens on Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash, and the cheaper per-token price isn’t always the cheaper bill. The last column converts each output price into a price per million English words, which is the fairer comparison for prose.

ModelTokenizerTokens per 1,000 wordsOutput per 1M words
Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude (Opus 4.7 and later)Provider’s published figure1,802$18.02
Gemini 3.8 FlashGeminiOur measurement1,186$4.45

English prose, measured on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (2026-10-11) or taken from the provider’s published words-per-token figure. Code, JSON and other languages use more tokens per word. Count your own text in the token counter or convert with tokens to words.

FAQ

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. For a support chatbot handling 1,000 requests a day, that is about $169.57 a month on Claude Sonnet 5.5 against $64.45 on Gemini 3.8 Flash, so Gemini 3.8 Flash is 2.6× cheaper there. Try your own numbers in the LLM cost calculator.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Their context windows are about the same size. Claude Sonnet 5.5 reads up to 1,000,000 tokens (roughly 750,000 English words) and writes up to 128,000 tokens per reply. Gemini 3.8 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens (roughly 786,432 English words) and writes up to 65,536 tokens per reply. The window is shared between your prompt and the reply. Word counts use a rough 0.75 words per token; real ratios depend on the tokenizer.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash better for coding?

We don’t publish benchmark scores, so this page can’t say which writes better code. What we can show is cost: a coding agent re-sending 40,000 tokens of context (80% cached) and writing 2,000 tokens, 200 times a day, costs about $238.47 a month on Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $96.73 on Gemini 3.8 Flash. Both support tool calling. Test both on tasks from your own repository.

Can Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash read images?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts images and files as well as text. Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts images, files, audio and video as well as text. So both can read screenshots, photos and scanned pages. This is what each provider declares for its API, not a measure of how well it works.

Are Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash open source?

No. Neither Claude Sonnet 5.5 nor Gemini 3.8 Flash has published weights: you can only use them through Anthropic’s and Google’s APIs and their cloud partners. If you need a model you can host yourself, compare open-weight options in the model comparison table.

Do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash count tokens the same way?

Not necessarily. Each model splits text into tokens with its own tokenizer, so the same prompt can be a different number of tokens on each, and per-token prices aren’t directly comparable. Claude Sonnet 5.5 uses about 1,802 tokens per 1,000 English words (the provider’s published figure). Gemini 3.8 Flash uses about 1,186 tokens per 1,000 English words (our measurement). Count your own text with the token counter or convert with tokens to words.

Updated

Sources: OpenRouter models API and LiteLLM model prices and context windows, checked daily; open-weight prices are typical hosted prices. Tokenizer figures: our measurements and Anthropic’s published words-per-token figure (see tokens to words). Confirm critical numbers on each provider’s pricing page. See our methodology.